Lloyd v. Hines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that an officer’s use of fraud or corrupt means to obtain a warrant gives rise to individual liability under § 768.28(9)(a)
• finding immunity pierced by allegations that two deputy sheriffs used “fraud or other corrupt means” to arrest, imprison and maliciously prosecute the plaintiff
• officers not entitled to immunity under § 768.28(9)(a) when they used fraud or corrupt means to obtain warrant
• a supervisory official may not be held liable under s. 1983 on a respondeat superior or vicarious liability theory
• a supervisory official may not be held liable under s. 1983 on a respondeat superior or vicarious liability theory
• a supervisory official may not be held liable under s. 1983 on a respondeat superior or vicarious liability theory.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).