Lloyd v. Chao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “satisfied the purpose underlying the EEO counseling requirement” by notifying supervisors of harassment and hostile work environment claims because “an employee’s contact with management officials is tantamount to initiating contact with an EEO counselor”
• reporting incident to supervisors within 45 days is tantamount to initiating contact with an EEO counselor
• “The purpose of the EEO counseling requirement is to give a federal agency an opportunity to informally resolve an employee’s complaint by conducting internal investigations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).