Lloyd N Jelks v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the appellant’s proposition that Pozonsky was under the influence of cocaine during the appellant's trial is a premise unsupported by the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pozonsky, supra
• denying PCRA relief in challenge to Judge Pozonsky presiding over the petitioner’s non- jury trial where the petitioner offered “no evidence to demonstrate that Judge Pozonsky was under the influence at the time of trial”
• “Arguable merit exists when the factual statements are accurate and could establish cause for relief. Whether the facts rise to the level of arguable merit is a legal determination.”
• claim of ineffective assistance fails unless petitioner satisfies all three prongs of ineffectiveness test
• “Arguable merit exists when the factual statements are accurate and could establish cause for relief. Whether the facts rise to the - 15 - J-S16014-25 level of arguable merit is a legal determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).