Skip to main content
· 1/10/1985

Lloyd Aucoin v. Matador Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 749 F.2d 1180
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1318
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • timely application “permits a near-contemporaneous assessment by the trial and appellate courts of the need for immediate appellate review” and “inform[s] the appellate court in a manner which allows it promptly to respond”
  • notice of appeal “misfires in function”
  • section 1292(b) and Rule 5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Politz, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.