Llizo v. City of Topeka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Scott and viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party where portions of the audio tape were garbled and indecipherable
• denying qualified immunity even though the plaintiff “did not suffer from asphyxia,” because the plaintiff “was kneed after he surrendered and was . . . laying [sic] prone on the ground”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).