Llamas-Valdez v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that step two errors are harmless when the ALJ identifies other severe impairments and proceeds in the sequential evaluation process
• holding that step two errors are harmless when the ALJ identifies other severe impairments and proceeds in the sequential evaluation process
• holding that step two errors are harmless when the ALJ identifies other severe impairments and proceeds in the sequential evaluation process
• stating that evidence following plaintiff’s DLI is irrelevant if there is no reasonable possibility that such evidence would change the outcome of plaintiff’s application
• noting that “the ALJ’s decision [made] clear that he considered ‘all symptoms’ and the ‘combination of impairments’ in making his determination,” and affirming the district court’s affirmance of the ALJ’s decision
• explaining that where the ALJ fails to note a particular impairment at step two but finds other severe impairments and considers the omitted impairment in the subsequent steps, “any error was harmless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).