L.J. Zucca, Inc. v. Allen Bros. Wholesale Distributors inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[a]n appellant may not raise new contentions for the first time in a reply brief\
• determining that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is \deem[ed] . . . to have been waived\
• determining that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is \deem[ed] . . . to have been waived\
• determining that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is \deem[ed] . . . to have been waived\
• noting \[a]n appellant may not raise new contentions for the first time in a reply brief\
• noting “[a]n appellant may not raise new contentions for the first time in a reply brief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).