Skip to main content
· 3/3/2009

Lizotte v. Praxair, Inc.

Citations

  • 640 F. Supp. 2d 1335
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21720
  • 2009 WL 564920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • only expert testimony \sworn at trial or a deposition\ is admissible under Rule 801(d)(2) ; \retention without testimony is not enough\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert S. Lasnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.