· 8/5/1986
Lizak v. Schultz
Citations
- 496 N.E.2d 40
- 1986 Ind. LEXIS 1221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that subsequent husband, as administrator of estate of deceased custodial parent, could bring action to collect a child-support arrear-age without proving the custodial parent had expended sums equivalent to the arrearage from her own money
- “‘general rule’ seems to have been honored more in the breach”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: DeBRULER, Dickson, Givan, Pivar-Nik, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.