Skip to main content
· 8/5/1986

Lizak v. Schultz

Citations

  • 496 N.E.2d 40
  • 1986 Ind. LEXIS 1221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subsequent husband, as administrator of estate of deceased custodial parent, could bring action to collect a child-support arrear-age without proving the custodial parent had expended sums equivalent to the arrearage from her own money
  • “‘general rule’ seems to have been honored more in the breach”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeBRULER, Dickson, Givan, Pivar-Nik, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.