Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that a plaintiff seeking to enforce an “exclusivity” clause as a restrictive covenant barring retail competition “prove two interrelated requirements necessary to establish its right to injunc-tive relief: (1) that it was without an adequate remedy at law, or (2
• two year old business not new, but not “well-established,” entitled to present evidence of lost future profits
• legal remedy for breach of contract was not made inadequate by lessee’s insufficient efforts to prove damages at trial and therefore lessee was not entitled to equitable relief
• “We recognize that impossibility of ascertaining the amount of plaintiffs legal damages may establish inadequacy of the legal remedy so as to support an award of injunctive relief ....”
• lack of adequate remedy at law is prerequisite for equitable relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).