Liviz v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining, “this [Davis] holding has not been overruled, and no statute requires corroboration in incest cases”
• allowing police officer to generically describe accusations of sexual abuse to explain the officer’s investigation
• testimony that victim reported the allegation was admissible to show what investigating officers did next and to provide a basis for their testimony
• victim’s out-of-court statements to witnesses were not offered for the truth of the allegations but rather to “explain how the allegations came to the attention of law enforcement”
• disclosure nearly a year after assault was not reasonably timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).