Livingston v. Klein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the court should have granted the motion of third-party defendants to dismiss the third- party complaint seeking contribution” where “the underlying action is based on breach of contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Laur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Cienzo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-07-07· cited 6×
• Scalp & Blade, Inc. v. Advest, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-12-30· cited 5×
• Dillon v. Peak Envtl., LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-06-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
  New York Court of Appeals· 1986-11-11· cited 8,793×
• Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-12-17· cited 188×
• Genesee Valley Club v. Walter Kidde & Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-11-15· cited 2×