Livingston v. Jordan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing relevant inquiry as whether the railroad’s “conduct in operating this railroad track crossing ... import[s] a want of such attention to the nature and probable consequences of [its] acts as a prudent man ordinarily bestows in his own concern”
• characterizing relevant inquiry as whether the railroad's \conduct in operating this railroad track crossing ... import[s] a want of such attention to the nature and probable consequences of [its] acts as a prudent man ordinarily bestows in his own concern\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).