Livingston Parish Sewer District No. 2 v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in summary judgment context, that non-movant was “not entitled to an evidentiary hearing or additional discovery” because he had not “successfully dispute[d] [movants’] showing with his own evidence—much less show[n] a genuine dispute of material fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).