Skip to main content
· 11/12/1991

Livingood v. Meece

Citations

  • 477 N.W.2d 183
  • 1991 N.D. LEXIS 196
  • 1991 WL 231547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court did not err in dismissing claim because the claim was abandoned when argument was not further developed or addressed after the claim was made in the complaint
  • “The motion should be granted only if it is disclosed with certainty the impossibility of proving a claim for which relief can be granted.”
  • motion to dismiss must be treated as motion for summary judgment when consideration of matters outside of pleadings is required
  • “[T]his court has specifically applied sovereign immunity as a bar to a direct cause of action against the state based on the alleged violation of state constitutional provisions, assuming that such a cause of action exists.”
  • “[T]his court has specifically applied sovereign immunity as a bar to a direct cause of action against the state based on the alleged violation of state constitutional provisions, assuming that such a cause of action exists.”
  • “[T]his court has specifically applied sovereign immunity as a bar to a direct cause of action against the state based on the alleged violation of state constitutional provisions, assuming that such a cause of action exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickstad, Gierke, Levine, Meschke, Vande, Walle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.