Skip to main content
· 6/21/2002

Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. United States Department of Agriculture

Citations

  • 207 F. Supp. 2d 992
  • 2002 DSD 18
  • 186 A.L.R. Fed. 689
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11625
  • 2002 WL 1363414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The Supreme Court in Glickman rejected the use of the Central Hudson test because [ Central Hudson ] involved a restriction on commercial speech rather than the compelled funding of speech involved in the California tree fruit marketing orders.\
  • “The Supreme Court in Glickman rejected the use of the Central Hudson test because [Central Hudson ] involved a restriction on commercial speech rather than the compelled funding of speech involved in the California tree fruit marketing orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kornmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.