Lively v. Drake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding payors were led to believe irregular payments would continue to be accepted without acceleration and that agreement was modified by parties’ course of conduct
• “We are of the opinion that the course of dealing between the parties over a period of almost two years was such that appellants had been led to believe that irregular payments [on a promissory note] would be accepted without acceleration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).