Liu Hop Fong v. United States
Citations
- 209 U.S. 453
- 28 S. Ct. 576
- 52 L. Ed. 888
- 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1686
Syllabus
<p>Under the provisions of § 13 of the act of September 13,1888, c. 1015, 25 Stat. 476 and § 3 of the act of May 15, 1890, c. 60, 27 Stat. 25, the appeal given to a Chinaman from an order of deportation made by a commissioner is a trial de novo before the district judge to which he is entitled before he can be ordered to be deported, and the order cannot be made on a transcript of proceedings before the commissioner. •</p> <p>After a commissioner has made and filed a certified transcript in the case of a Chinaman ordered by him to be deported his authority over the matter ends. There is no statutory right to make up and file additional findings.</p> <p>While a certificate issued as provided by § 3 of the Treaty of December, 1894 between the United States and China to entitle Chinese subjects to enter the United'Statesr.may be.overcome by proper evidence, and may not have the effect of a judicial determination, when a Chinaman has been admitted to the United States on a certificate made in conformity with the’ treaty, he cannot be deported for having fraudulently entered the United States unless there is competent evidence to overcome the legal effect of the certificate.</p>
Judges: Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.