Litzinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a job offer which required a claimant to make a daily round trip commute of 232 miles was unreasonable even though the claimant would be provided with a motel room because this would require the Claimant to be away from home at least four nights a week
• holding as a matter of law that light-duty work offered to former over-the-road truck driver was “totally unreasonable” when work was located 116 miles away from claimant’s residence even though the employer offered to provide a motel room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).