Litz v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant must object and obtain adverse ruling before he can complain on appeal about an erroneous jury argument
• holding that a defendant’s failure to object to jury argument forfeits his right to complain on appeal
• holding that a defendant’s failure to object to jury argument forfeits his right to complain on appeal
• holding that a defendant's failure to object to jury argument forfeits his right to complain on appeal
• conducting a harm analysis after determining that the trial court did not commit error
• requiring substantial compliance with Article 38.22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).