Littrell v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because this Court holds that plaintiffs’ claims . . . are barred by the statute of limitations, any attempt to amend would be futile.”
• defendants’ disclosures were “tempered with positive statements,” but that optimism couldn’t have prevented investors from discovering the facts needed to bring suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).