Littreal v. Redwine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the attorney’s “argument cannot be said to have constituted a forbidden comment on the failure of the defendant ] to testify[,]” because “[h]e merely reviewed certain testimony and added, truthfully, that there was no evidence in contradiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).