Skip to main content
· 6/16/1982

Littlejohn v. Englund (In Re Englund)

Citations

  • 20 B.R. 957
  • 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relation back of section 523(a)(4) complaint to section 523(a)(2) complaint held permissible as “[t]he conduct of defendant required by this exception to discharge is identifiable within the allegations of the original complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey D. Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.