Skip to main content
· 7/13/1992

Littlefield v. State Ex Rel. Taxation & Revenue Department

Citations

  • 839 P.2d 134
  • 114 N.M. 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district court may review mandatory driver’s license revocation by a petition for writ of certiorari
  • noting that, even though the 12 period of revocation had expired, the order revoking the petitioner’s driver’s license 13 continues to affect driving privileges
  • noting lack of express statutory authority for the right to appeal from a mandatory driver’s license revocation
  • requiring timely request for transcript or appellant assumes risk of loss
  • board that had access to record and concurred with hearing officer’s recommendation not required to have reviewed the record in order to meet due process
  • noting remanding and rehearing remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donnelly, Hartz, Pickard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.