Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “allegations involv[ing] different co-workers and supervisors, in different time periods” involved “differences [that] preclude[d] invocation of the continuing violation doctrine”
• finding that rejection of sexual advances does not comprise protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).