Little v. Liggett

Citations

• 92 Kan. 385
• 140 P. 838
• 1914 Kan. LEXIS 239

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Written Contract — Ambiguous and Incomplete — Parol Evidence to Explain and Supplement and to Show it Was to Take Effect Conditionally. The doctrine of the case of Babcock v. Deford, 14 Kan. 408, permitting an ambiguous and incomplete contract to be explained and supplemented by parol evidence, and the doctrine of Stroupe v. Hewitt, 90 Kan. 200, 113 Pac. 562, permitting the introduction of parol evidence to show that a contract was not to take effect until the ascertainment of some fact, applied to an application for a loan containing a notation with respect to the commission for securing the loan, in a suit for the commission.</p>