Skip to main content
· 1/16/1886

Little v. Jacks

Citations

  • 68 Cal. 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Questions of recusal must be considered on a case-by-case basis, applying the pertinent laws of this State.”
  • “Questions of recusal must be considered on a case-by-case basis, applying the pertinent laws of this State.”
  • “Questions of recusal must be considered on a case-by-case basis, applying the pertinent laws of this State.”
  • “Questions of recusal must be considered on a case-by-case basis, applying the pertinent laws of this State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.