Little v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to reconsider its holding that Section 2462 did not apply to the SEC’s claims for injunctive relief and disgorgement
• finding arbitration agreement “relating to 3 [employee’s] application or candidacy for employment, employment, and/or cessation of 4 employment” an employment contract under the FAA
• “False advertising claims under . . . the 3 fraudulent and unfair prongs of the UCL are governed by the reasonable consumer 4 standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).