Little v. Gillette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a fraudulent inducement case, that \the party's recovery is based on the difference in value of the property as fraudulently represented and its value in actuality\
• “An essential element required to sustain an action for fraudulent misrepresentation is that a defendant’s statement must induce the plaintiff to act to his injury or damage.”
• directed verdict was proper where no evidence of reliance on statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).