Skip to main content

Little v. Gillette

Citations

  • 354 N.W.2d 147
  • 218 Neb. 271
  • 1984 Neb. LEXIS 1205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in a fraudulent inducement case, that \the party's recovery is based on the difference in value of the property as fraudulently represented and its value in actuality\
  • “An essential element required to sustain an action for fraudulent misrepresentation is that a defendant’s statement must induce the plaintiff to act to his injury or damage.”
  • directed verdict was proper where no evidence of reliance on statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Shanahan, Grant, Colwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Little v. Gillette

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.