Skip to main content
· 1/22/1910

Little v. Gibb

Citations

  • 57 Wash. 92
  • 106 P. 491
  • 1910 Wash. LEXIS 701

Syllabus

<p>Deeds — Acknowledgment—Necessity—Notice. A written grant of an interest in land — an easement for water pipes — is valid without acknowledgment, as between the parties and subsequent purchasers with notice.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • An expert testifying about a failure to meet generally accepted standards must “identify and articulate the requisite standard that was not complied with.”
  • An expert testifying about a failure to meet generally accepted standards must \identify and articulate the requisite standard that was not complied with.\
  • An expert testifying about a failure to meet generally accepted standards must “identify and articulate the requisite standard that was not complied with.”
  • “The expert must articulate an objective standard of care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rudkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.