Little v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that although zeal in advocacy is commendable, an inherently unfair proceeding, or a “trial by combat” approach is rejected
• stating that “[zjeal in advocacy is commendable, but zeal, even in advocacy, without bounds may be contemptuous and disruptive”
• stating that “[z]eal in advocacy is commendable, but zeal, even in advocacy, without bounds may be contemptuous and disruptive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).