Little Rock Family Planning Services, P.A. v. Jegley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Arkansas's partial birth abortion statute unconstitutional because it created an undue burden by encompassing D&E and suction curettage procedures
• holding Arkansas's partial birth abortion statute unconstitutional because it created an undue burden by encompassing D&E and suction curettage procedures
• rejecting argument that scienter requirement limits scope of Arkansas partial birth abortion statute to cover only D&X procedure
• rejecting argument that scienter requirement limits scope of Arkansas partial birth abortion statute to cover only D&X procedure
• rejecting argument that scienter requirement limits scope of Arkansas partial birth abortion statute to cover only D & X procedure
• applying similar reasoning with reference to Nebraska partial birth abortion statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).