Skip to main content
· 4/15/1993

Lite v. State

Citations

  • 617 So. 2d 1058
  • 1993 WL 113519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining in the context of driver’s licenses that “there is no property interest in possessing a driver’s license. Rather, driving is a privilege and can be taken away or encumbered as a means of meeting a legitimate legislative goal”
  • “[E]qual protection is not violated where a permissible classification includes one, but not others who might have been included in the broader classifications, as long as those within the legally formed class are accorded equal treatment under the law creating the classification.”
  • substantive due process and equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.