Skip to main content
· 5/27/2003

Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance Plan

Citations

  • 330 F.3d 19
  • 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1783
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10442
  • 2003 WL 21212524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiff's argument regarding the impropriety of summary judgment was based on evidence beyond the administrative record
  • noting that a court’s review under ERISA is generally limited to materials in the administrative record
  • stating that on cross motions for summary judgment in an ERISA case, \the issue ... is simply whether the judge deems the administrator’s denial of benefits irrational\
  • finding meaningful review where “the Council afforded her a full adversarial and evidentiary hearing” and both parties were represented by counsel
  • precluding supplementation of an administrative record, reasoning \how could an administrator act unreasonably by ignoring information never presented to it?\
  • “[0]n the contrary, the rationality standard tends to resolve doubts in favor of the administrator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.