· 5/27/2003
Liston v. Unum Corp. Officer Severance Plan
Citations
- 330 F.3d 19
- 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1783
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10442
- 2003 WL 21212524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiff's argument regarding the impropriety of summary judgment was based on evidence beyond the administrative record
- noting that a court’s review under ERISA is generally limited to materials in the administrative record
- stating that on cross motions for summary judgment in an ERISA case, \the issue ... is simply whether the judge deems the administrator’s denial of benefits irrational\
- finding meaningful review where “the Council afforded her a full adversarial and evidentiary hearing” and both parties were represented by counsel
- precluding supplementation of an administrative record, reasoning \how could an administrator act unreasonably by ignoring information never presented to it?\
- “[0]n the contrary, the rationality standard tends to resolve doubts in favor of the administrator.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.