Lister v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “if the attractive nuisance doctrine applies, it is presumed that the child is a trespasser” because “the doctrine was created as an exception to the rule as to trespassers”
• the violation of a statute which imposes upon a person the affirmative duty to take certain action, and provides penalties for the failure to do so, even if negligence per se, may be overcome by proof of other circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).