Liskowitz v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the ALJ was entitled to credit expert testimony when claimant did not challenge its evidentiary basis at hearing
• holding that [a]s few as 174 jobs have been held to be significant, … and it appears to be well-established that 1,000 jobs is a significant number.”
• finding that ALJ was entitled to credit VE testimony where claimant did not object during hearing
• holding ALJ was entitled to credit testimony of VE where claimant failed to object to testimony during hearing or contradict it
• holding that 4,000 jobs in the Milwaukee area was significant
• finding that plaintiff forfeited argument concerning VE’s testimony by failing to object to it during the hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).