Lisetta Molnar v. Lloyd Booth and East Chicago Community School Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury could find that taking art supplies away from plaintiff, who was interning as a junior high school art teacher, was a tangible employment action
• holding that removing resources necessary for the plaintiff- employee to do her job constituted a tangible employment action
• holding that jury could find that taking art supplies away from plaintiff, who was interning as a junior high school art teacher, was a tangible employment action
• explaining that litigants cannot wait until appeal to raise concerns that could have been addressed by district court
• finding a tangible employment action when a jury could find that confiscated supplies were “neces- sary” to perform the assigned job
• finding a tangible employment action when a jury could find that confiscated supplies were “neces- sary” to perform the assigned job

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).