Liscinski v. Mosley (In Re Mosley)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “[although many courts have interpreted ERISA to prohibit any type of attachment of benefits under ERISA-qualified plans, the language of the statute itself does not explicitly prohibit such attachment by creditors”
• per se exclusion of ERISA plans not appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).