Lisa Homer v. Nathaniel Jones-Bey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Indiana law allows service by certified mail to a defendant’s workplace, but the return receipt must identify who accepted the mail
• noting that several 16 federal courts “have held vague returns . . . to be inadequate”
• “Once such a prima facie showing is made, the burden shifts to the defendant to demonstrate that service was not received.”
• “once such a prima facie showing is made, the burden shifts to the defendant to demonstrate that service was not received”
• “If the district court had no jurisdiction over the movant, its judgment is void and it is an abuse of discretion to deny the movant's request to set aside the judgment under Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).