Skip to main content
· 6/19/2015

Lisa Edwards v. Commissioner of IRS

Citations

  • 416 U.S. App. D.C. 178
  • 791 F.3d 1
  • 115 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2195
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10323
  • 2015 WL 3797842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a moving party must produce evidence negating an 5 essential element of a nonmoving party’s claim or show that the nonmoving party lacks sufficient 6 evidence of an essential element to carry the burden of persuasion at trial
  • “The tax court does not have jurisdiction to consider a taxpayer’s Section 6213 petition unless the IRS has first issued the taxpayer a notice of deficiency”
  • “The tax court also lacks jurisdiction if the taxpayer’s petition is not timely filed”
  • “The tax court is a court of limited jurisdiction ... and its jurisdiction is predicated on both the issuance of a notice of deficiency and the filing of a timely petition.”
  • “A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint without 5 || leave to amend unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not 6 cured by amendment.”
  • “A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint without 5 || leave to amend unless ‘it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not 6 cured by amendment.’’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Rogers, Pillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.