· 6/19/2015
Lisa Edwards v. Commissioner of IRS
Citations
- 416 U.S. App. D.C. 178
- 791 F.3d 1
- 115 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2195
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10323
- 2015 WL 3797842
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a moving party must produce evidence negating an 5 essential element of a nonmoving party’s claim or show that the nonmoving party lacks sufficient 6 evidence of an essential element to carry the burden of persuasion at trial
- “The tax court does not have jurisdiction to consider a taxpayer’s Section 6213 petition unless the IRS has first issued the taxpayer a notice of deficiency”
- “The tax court also lacks jurisdiction if the taxpayer’s petition is not timely filed”
- “The tax court is a court of limited jurisdiction ... and its jurisdiction is predicated on both the issuance of a notice of deficiency and the filing of a timely petition.”
- “A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint without 5 || leave to amend unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not 6 cured by amendment.”
- “A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint without 5 || leave to amend unless ‘it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not 6 cured by amendment.’’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Rogers, Pillard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.