· 1/27/1998
Lisa Dean v. Motel 6 Operating L.P. Motel 6 G.P., Inc. Accor North America Corporation and Accor S.A.
Citations
- 134 F.3d 1269
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1038
- 1998 WL 25154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Dean must provide sufficient evidence for us to conclude that Accor is being brought into court for something that it has done, not for something that Motel 6 Operating has done.”
- where “the reason for not having an evidentiary hearing was that there was no ‘real dispute’ as to the facts or to the extent of discovery ... plaintiffs face the same burden as they would if there had been an evidentiary hearing: proof of jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boggs, Moore, Dowd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.