LISA BARRETT, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LIZZIE CURRY v. EARL L. FARRIOR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is clear that such evidence [of intoxication] was relevant to the issue of whether Egelhoff acted knowingly and purposely”
• \It is clear that such evidence [of intoxication] was relevant to the issue of whether Egelhoff acted knowingly and purposely\
• overruled on other grounds b Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 116 S. Ct. 2013 (1996)
• “[rjetroactivity is properly treated as a threshold question” (quoting Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 300-01, 109 S. Ct. 1060, 1070 (1989))
• “With regard to the question of retroactivity, the United States Supreme Court has additionally made its position more clear and we find this also to be binding upon us.”
• “With regard to the question of retroactivity, the United States Supreme Court has additionally made its position more clear and we find this also to be binding upon us.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).