Liquidators of Lehman Bros. Australia Ltd. v. Lehman Bros. Special Financing Inc. (In Re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial without prejudice of a motion to intervene is a final order, in part, because the denial without prejudice occurred in conjunction with a stay that prevented the movant from refiling the motion and prejudiced its interests
• explaining that finality in bankruptcy proceedings “is more flexible than in other civil litigation . . . . [b]ecause bankruptcy cases frequently entail protracted proceedings involving many parties”
• reviewing a bankruptcy court order denying creditors’ motion for leave to intervene without prejudice
• “Rule 24(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure . . . requires an intervention motion to be accompanied by a proposed pleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).