Liquidation of Ideal Mutual Insurance v. Doug Ruedlinger, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the statutory scheme as a whole may require the unambiguous language of the Act to “yield . . . where absurd or bizarre results would otherwise ensue”
• “[Prior case] was more on the question whether a grant of FUP benefits conferred a ‘status’ than on whether it constitutes an ‘admission.’ We do not dispute that an alien who was granted FUP benefits has a ‘status’ for immigration purposes.”
• “[Prior case] was more on the question whether a grant of FUP benefits conferred a ‘status’ than on whether it constitutes an ‘admission.’ We do not dispute that an alien who was granted FUP benefits has a ‘status’ for immigration purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).