Lipton v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 21 evidence of loss reserves “may or may not be relevant in a subsequent bad faith action, 22 depending on the issues presented”
• reserves cannot automatically be deemed irrelevant to an insured's bad-faith claim against an insurer
• reserves cannot automatically be deemed irrelevant to an insured’s bad-faith claim against an insurer
• statutorily required loss reserve relevant to first-party bad faith claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).