Lipton v. Pathogenesis Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]laintiffs who plead the required state of mind in general terms of mere ‘motive and opportunity’ or ‘recklessness’ fail to meet the PSLRA’s heightened pleading requirements.”
• scienter cannot be 23 pled merely by alleging that “officers and directors possess motive and opportunity to enhance a 24 company’s business prospects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-31· cited 1,078×
• Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 797×
• California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-07-06· cited 379×
• Guerrero v. Gates
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 223×
• In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2003-02-19· cited 193×
• Abrams v. Baker Hughes Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-05-21· cited 160×
• Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Thomas Gonzales
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 142×
• Police Retire. Sys of St Louis v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-07-16· cited 129×
• Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-09-01· cited 127×
• Falkowski v. Imation Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-10-29· cited 98×
• Vicky Nguyen v. Endologix, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-06-10· cited 92×
• Pension Trust Fund for Operating Eng'rs v. Kohl's Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-07-12· cited 73×
• 84 Employer-Teamster Joint Council Pension Trust Fund v. America West Holding Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-02-13· cited 56×
• Anderson v. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-07-06· cited 49×
• In Re Immune Response Securities Litigation
  S.D. California· 2005-06-07· cited 43×
• Daniela Prodanova v. H.C. Wainwright & Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-04-08· cited 40×
• In Re Cornerstone Propane Partners, L.P. Securities Litigation
  N.D. California· 2005-02-07· cited 35×
• Broudo v. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 35×
• James Webb v. Solarcity Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 32×
• In Re Calpine Corporation Securities Litigation
  N.D. California· 2003-08-28· cited 31×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lopez v. Smith
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-02-10· cited 9,722×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-25· cited 794×
• Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1999-09-03· cited 689×
• Novak v. Kasaks
  Second Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 686×
• Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 639×
• Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1999-10-08· cited 440×
• In Re Worlds Of Wonder Securities Litigation
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-09-15· cited 307×
• In Re: Comshare, Incorporated Securities Litigation. Harry M. Hoffman v. Comshare, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-08-23· cited 305×
• Ronconi v. Larkin
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-06-06· cited 281×
• United States of America, Exrel., Insoon Lee v. Smithkline Beecham, Inc. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories Does 1-100
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-04-02· cited 236×
• Nathenson v. Zonagen Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-10-15· cited 231×
• Jules Brody Joyce T. Crawford v. Transitional Hospitals Corporation Wendy L. Simpson Richard L. Conte
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-02-07· cited 230×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-11-17· cited 190×
• City of Philadelphia v. Fleming Companies, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-09-07· cited 151×
• Lipton v. Pathogenesis Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-03-20· cited 141×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,222 William M. McCormick v. The Fund American Companies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 93×
• In Re FVC. COM Securities Litigation
  N.D. California· 2000-02-14· cited 9×