Skip to main content
· 3/5/2001

Lipton v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.

Citations

  • 135 F. Supp. 2d 182
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2491
  • 2001 WL 273076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the outside materials only to the extent that they did not contradict with the facts alleged in the complaint
  • “[W]here a document is referred to in the complaint and is central to the plaintiff’s claims, such a document attached to the motion papers may be considered without converting the motion to one for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.