Lipsztein v. Mount Sinai Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that assignment was void because of a failure to comply with New York’s Business Corporation Law and thus dismissing the complaint
• “[E]quitable defenses are unavailable when the rights being pressed by a party are based upon a void document.”
• “To be a real party in interest, an assignee ‘must have some title, legal or equitable, to the thing assigned.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).