Skip to main content
· 6/21/2001

Lipson v. Lipson

Citations

  • 799 A.2d 345
  • 2001 Del. LEXIS 283
  • 2001 WL 710207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a judgment on the merits of any request for ancillary relief is not final until an outstanding related application for an award of attorney’s fees has been decided.”
  • holding that each final ruling by the Family Court on a request for a specific type of relief ancillary to the parties’ divorce is directly and separately appealable to the Delaware Supreme Court
  • noting that the Delaware rule on finality with regard to the pendency of an application for attorney’s fees is different than the federal rule
  • “[T]his Court has consistently held, and hereby reaffirmed, that a judgment on the merits of any request for ancillary relief is not final until an outstanding related application for an award of attorney’s fees has been decided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Berger'

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.