Lipshultz v. K & G Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where contract provided for indemnification to owner’s “agents,” the fact that a general contractor could “theoretically” be considered the owner’s statutory agent was insufficient to require indemnification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Lipshultz v. K & G Industries, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Lipshultz v. K & G Industries, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-05-09· cited 1×