Lipshultz v. K & G Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where contract provided for indemnification to owner’s “agents,” the fact that a general contractor could “theoretically” be considered the owner’s statutory agent was insufficient to require indemnification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bush v. Mechanicville Warehouse Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-12-09· cited 247×
• Cano v. Mid-Valley Oil Co., Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-06-07· cited 10×
• Tonking v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-12-11· cited 5×
• Juncal v. W 12/14 Wall Acquisition Associates, LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-02-14· cited 5×
• Linares v. United Management Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-03-07· cited 5×
• A.R. Mack Construction Co. v. Patricia Electric, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-03-19· cited 4×
• O'Berg v. MacManus Group, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-10-03· cited 4×
• Chong Fu Huang v. 57-63 Greene Realty, LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2019-07-24

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-11-21· cited 699×
• Solomon v. City of New York
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-05-28· cited 9×
• Wisniewski v. Kings Plaza Shopping Center of Flatbush Avenue, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-01-22· cited 2×

Other cases named Lipshultz v. K & G Industries, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Lipshultz v. K & G Industries, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-05-09· cited 1×